Four Lessons from the Forum: What we Learned at the 2017 HLPF

The content of this blog was originally published on July 20, 2017 in Sigthsavers’ Blog, as “Four lessons from the Forum: what we learned at this week’s HLPF”. Find the original blog here

Author: Andrew Griffiths (Head of Advocacy, Sightsavers – @griffithsar)

Photo: Participants at the HLPF side-event ‘Open, inclusive, participatory and transparent’: How can voluntary national reviews support the pledge to “leave no one behind” in implementing the 2030 Agenda? (Photo credit: Sightsavers)

 

During the  UN High-Level Political Forum (HLPF) in New York, held from July 10th to 19th, Sightsavers had a delegation from Bangladesh, India, Kenya and Sierra Leone. The organization’s key priority was to see how we can learn from other countries and partners in progressing the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) at a national level. Being here has really strengthened my belief that meaningful change will only happen at a national level…

Here’s why…

During the post-2015 negotiations we focused on the inter-governmental process to come up with and agree the SDGs and the wider 2030 Agenda. This meant that our efforts were focused on engaging Member States in New York, to ensure not only that the agenda was as strong as possible, but also that it included the voices of people with disabilities, who are among the most marginalised groups in society. Now, we want to see this agenda put into action at a national level – this means that since 2015 our focus has shifted from New York to the countries in which we work.

My colleagues from Bangladesh, India, Kenya and Sierra Leone were at the HLPF because they have been actively engaged with the Voluntary National Review (VNR) process, a slightly strange activity where countries present 15-minute infomercials about their work on the SDGs.

“Some countries have mentioned challenges, although most have clearly viewed this as a PR exercise.”

But behind the presentations from 44 countries who submitted VNRs this year is the work of organisations like Sightsavers, operating at a national level where VNRs can be used to stimulate a discussion around the implementation of the 2030 Agenda in each country. This is the really exciting element of the work; and it’s where we can make huge progress towards achieving the SDGs and ensuring we leave no one behind.

Four lessons I’ve learned this week

All government ministries (beyond the SDG focal ministry) have to be involved in the VNR process. The challenge here is that VNRs are often a defined process by governments to pull a report together and present it in New York, rather than the culmination of truly national efforts to implement the 2030 Agenda. We’re not yet seeing leadership at a national level beyond ministries of planning (or equivalent) and changing this is the responsibility of civil society, as well as governments.

Where civil society is organised at a national level it can make a big difference, including for disability. Unfortunately there really aren’t enough examples of this: a lot of our work over the months before the VNRs in Bangladesh, Kenya, India, Nigeria and Zimbabwe this year has been to coordinate civil society and ensure the voices of people with disabilities are heard within it. On the plus side, we’ve capitalised on the work we did last year in Sierra Leone, and a large number of the Sierra Leone 2030 Coalition members attended the HLPF this year, which is fantastic and demonstrative of great progress in Sierra Leone

The role of parliaments is being seen as more and more important. We supported the Chair of the Sierra Leone Parliamentary SDG Committee to attend this HLPF and I have heard parliamentarians from the UK, Sweden, Afghanistan and others outlining how parliaments will need to increase their role in supporting national planning and holding governments to account.

We need to focus on the specific rather than the general. Too many times, civil society at an international level misses opportunities to engage in a more constructive conversation with governments about how the SDGs are being implemented, how we are participating and what the challenges and lessons are. This is what the HLPF is for, and while there are challenges around the inclusivity, participatory and transparency aspects of the conference,

“[…]my recommendation to civil society would be for it to focus on creating constructive and specific discussions, rather than focusing on general concerns.”

B+ good work: must try harder

We can’t forget that this agenda is only two years old. We’ve come a long way – and a lot of that is extremely exciting – but this year’s High-Level Political Forum is a reminder that there is clearly room for improvement!


About the author:

Andrew Griffiths is head of advocacy at Sightsavers. He manages an international team in over 20 countries to influence public policy on issues related to avoidable blindness and disability rights. He co-chairs the Together 2030 initiative, alongside roles in other international coalitions and consortiums. 

 

 

Together 2030 is a civil society initiative that brings together more than 450 organisations from 89 countries to promote national implementation and track progress of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

Advertisements

One thought on “Four Lessons from the Forum: What we Learned at the 2017 HLPF

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s